Took the little bike for another Dyno run yesterday, I knew I was too rich as I didn't want any problems on the 100 miles run last week, I was running 260 mains , snorkel fitted , bike has mild road tune and Swarbricks.
It gave more top end without he snorkel but was a little weak, so I trimmed an inch off the snorkel and stayed with that setting, might just remove the snorkel and go up to 300 mains though , any thoughts ?
(https://pure2strokespirit.net/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi689.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fvv251%2Fhowardrd%2Fimage-104.jpg&hash=3a22e54bb48c0883af0486227e43dfb06d57add1) (http://s689.photobucket.com/user/howardrd/media/image-104.jpg.html)
The curve looks better without the snorkel , great comparisons ! O0
Ah a dynostar dyno that is coming from the Netherlands 8)
Same as Neal.
Looking at your curve, I would focus on ''with out the snorkels''
Try if you can find the right mains for that modification
46HP is certainly a good start
Are there no restrictions in the pipe's it self on the R1-Z?
Everything on my R1-Z is same as UK 2MA , ie carbs, loom, CDi, barrels etc, bike is fitted with old school Swarbrick pipes, going to remove the snorkel this week and try 300 mains , just hope I don't loose any mid range, although needle is dropped a slot to position 4 from top, pilots 25 up from 20's.
Sorry, I must have over read this part
Quotebike has mild road tune and Swarbricks.
Then I would say, it definitely could use more air if the engine has a mild tune with (performance) exhausts.
So snorkels removed, and rejet.
What cdi unit do you have? Looks like there quit some differences
(https://pure2strokespirit.net/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bdkraceeng.co.uk%2FImages%2FTZR250ign.gif&hash=02668af73d3f44d988ff4a50e8d29b18159e5b81)